PL EN
RESEARCH PAPER
To determine the stability of the metrobus in unstable driving modes
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Automobiles and Automotive industry, National university of water and environmental engineering, Ukraine
 
2
Department of Automobiles, National transport university, Ukraine
 
 
Submission date: 2021-02-28
 
 
Final revision date: 2021-03-13
 
 
Acceptance date: 2021-03-23
 
 
Publication date: 2021-03-31
 
 
Corresponding author
Roman Marchuk   

Department of Automobiles and Automotive industry, National university of water and environmental engineering, Rivne, Ukraine
 
 
The Archives of Automotive Engineering – Archiwum Motoryzacji 2021;91(1):63-79
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Recently in many cities of the world began to introduce so-called «metrobus» or BRT (Bus Rapid Transit) systems, which became a cheaper alternative to the metro and other rail transport, in particular trams. The aim of the work is to determine the stability indicators of the metrobus in the transitional traffic modes, in particular when performing such manoeuvres as «steering wheel jerk» and «shuffle». For this purpose, the equations of metrobus plane-parallel motion are supplemented by equations of the links of the road train in the vertical plane by halopilation (tangage, trim) and roll.The critical straight-line speed of the three-link metrobus has been determined, which was 32,06 m/s, and this speed is independent of the corners of the steering wheels of the bus and the trailer links.It has been shown that as the steering wheel angle of the bus increases, the difference in the folding angles of the bus increases, with the second folding angle significantly exceeding the first, especially considering the roll of the metrobus body. It has been established that the greatest rolls and loads of the metrobus axles are those of the last trailer, which is the limiting factor for the critical speed. The lateral accelerations of individual metrobus links and their yaw velocity when performing the manoeuvre «steering wheel jerk» and «shuffle, Sl = 24 m», show that both the bus and the second trailer link are a limiting factor when performing various manoeuvres, but the acceleration value does not exceed the permissible 0,4g, so its stability under these conditions is ensured.
REFERENCES (12)
1.
Galluppi O., Formentin S., Novara C., Savaresi S.M.: Nonlinear stability control of autonomous vehicles: a MIMO D2-IBC solution. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2017, 50(1), 3691–3696, DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.563.
 
2.
Hales F.D.: The vertical motion lateral stability of road vehicle trains. R&d Rept. Transport and road research laboratory. Technology University. UK. 1974, 79, https://trid.trb.org/view/1127... (accessed on 15.10 2019).
 
3.
Хребет В.Г., Мисько Е.М., Вербицкий В.Г.: К экспериментальному определению зависимостей сил бокового увода двухосного экипажа в кривых оворачиваемости. Матеріали Х Міжнародної науково-практичної конференції «Cучасні технології та перспективи розвитку автомобільного транспорту». Вінниця, ВНТУ. 2018, 126–128, (in Russian: Hrebet V.G., Mysko E.M., Verbytsky V.G. To experimental determination of the forces of lateral disposal of the two-axle crew in folding curves. Vinnytsia).
 
4.
Hsueh-Ju Chen, Wei-Jiun Su, Fu-Cheng Wang: Modeling and analyses of a connected multi-car train system employing the inerter. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. 2017, 9(8), 1–13, DOI: 10.1177/1687814017701703.
 
5.
Колесникович А.Н., Выгонный А.Г.: Устойчивость прицепного автопоезда повышенной длины (25,25 м) при прямолинейном движении. Актуальные вопросы машиноведения. 2018, 7, 96–100, (in Russian: Kolesnykovych A.N., Vyhonyi A.H. Stability of a high-length trailer (25.25 m) in straight movement. Minsk).
 
6.
Кузнєцов Р.М.: Вибір та обґрунтування типу підвіски для причепа три ланкового сідельно-причіпного автопоїзда.Вісник Національного транспортного університету. К. 2004, 9, 293–299, (in Ukrainian: R.M. Kuznetsov. Selection and justification the type of suspension for three-link truck trailer. Kyiv).
 
7.
Luo R., Zeng J.: Hunting stability analysis of train system and comparison with single vehicle model. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2008, 44(4), 184–188, DOI: 10.3901/JME.2008.04.184.
 
8.
Омельницький О.Є.: Аналіз конструкції метробусів. Автошляховик України. 2018, 3, 7–11, (in Ukrainian: Omelnitsky O.E. Analysis of metrobus construction. Kyiv).
 
9.
Sakhno V., Gerlici J., Poliakov V., Kravchenko A., Omelnitsky O., Lask T.: Road train motion stability in BRT system. XXIII Polish-Slovak Scientific Conference. Machine modelling and simulation. Book of abstracts. Rydzyna, Poland. 2018, 49–57, DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201925403007.
 
10.
Schmid I.: Engineering Approach to Truck and Tractor Train Stability. SAE International. 1968, 76(1), 1–26, https://www.jstor.org/stable/4... (accessed on 18.12.2020).
 
11.
Стельмащук В.В., Кузнєцов Р.М., Мурований І.С., Лагошна О.О.: Керованість і стійкість триланкових автопоїздів у неусталених режимах руху. Вісник Національного транспортного університету в 2-х частинах: Ч.1. К., НТУ. 2006, 13, 74–81, (in Ukrainian: Stelmaschuk V.V., Kuznetsov R.M., Murovaniui I.S., Lagochna A.A. Handling and stability of three-link road trains in tireless traffic regimes. Kyiv).
 
12.
Yamagychi K.: Development of the New Light-Duty Hybrid Truck. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2008, 2(4), 108–117, DOI: 10.3390/wevj2040343.
 
Declaration of availability
 
eISSN:2084-476X
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top